US Market Report for On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Devices 2018 - MedCore

iData Research
381 Pages - IDR10491
$2,995.00

CPB is also used in heart valve replacement and repair procedures, repair of septal and congenital heart defects and transplants. However, for the purposes of this report, this chapter analyzes the use of CPB specifically in ONCAB procedures. During an ONCAB procedure, the patient’s heart is stopped temporarily while surgeons use a continuous thread and hand sew vessels together to bypass the blockages. During this procedure, a mechanical cardiopulmonary bypass machine keeps the blood circulating through the body. The blood is rerouted through the healthy vessel and blood flow is restored to the heart muscle. Redirecting the blood flow to a pump enables the surgeon to clamp the aorta and stop the heart, resulting in a motionless and bloodless field. This allows the surgeon to precisely perform manual suturing to obtain accurate connections (anastomoses) between the graft vessel and the aorta, as well as effectively bypass the narrowed or obstructed coronary artery. The absence of blood flow and a motionless heart are important factors in ensuring precision and providing consistent, reproducible positive clinical outcomes.
There are some downsides to the use of CPB pumps. Use of the CPB for circulation exposes the patient’s blood to foreign surfaces, which has been shown to increase the incidence of bleeding and short-term neurocognitive defects. This is known as post-perfusion syndrome or “pump head.” Symptoms of post-perfusion syndrome are subtle and include defects associated with attention, concentration, short-term memory, fine motor function and speed of mental and motor responses. Additionally, stopping of the heart may damage the heart muscle. In certain studies, clamping of the aorta has been shown in certain studies to cause the release of particles into the blood stream that may produce blockages in other parts of the body, such as the brain, which may lead to neurological damage, including strokes. Despite these potential complications, the majority of CABG procedures are still performed on-pump. Furthermore, the percentage of total CABG procedures performed on-pump has been increasing year-over-year since 2004.

'

TABLE OF CONTENTS I
LIST OF FIGURES XII
LIST OF CHARTS XV
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
U.S. CARDIAC SURGERY AND HEART VALVE DEVICE MARKET OVERVIEW 1
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 4
MARKET TRENDS 7
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 11
PROCEDURE NUMBERS 12
PROCEDURE CODES INVESTIGATED 16
MARKETS INCLUDED 17
KEY REPORT UPDATES 19
VERSION HISTORY 20
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 21
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 21
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 24
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 26
Step 4: Performing Primary Research 27
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 29
Step 6: Market Forecasts and Analysis 30
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 32
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 33
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 34
DISEASE OVERVIEW 35
2.1 BASIC ANATOMY 35
2.1.11 Coronary Artery Disease 37
2.1.12 Myocardial Infarction 37
2.1.13 Angina Pectoris 38
2.1.14 Heart Valve Disease 39
2.1.15 Congestive Heart Failure 39
PRODUCT PORTFOLIO 41
3.1.1 Tissue Heart Valves 41
3.1.2 Mechanical Tissue Heart Valves 43
3.1.3 Annuloplasty Repair Devices 45
3.1.4 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Devices 47
3.1.5 Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Devices 49
3.1.6 On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Devices 50
3.1.7 Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Devices 52
3.1.8 Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting Devices 53
3.1.9 Anastomosis Assist Devices 54
3.1.10 Transmyocardial Revascularization Devices 55
3.1.11 Ventricular Assist Devices 56
3.1.12 Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Device 57
3.1.13 Temporary Artificial Heart Replacement Device 58
3.1.14 Remote Hemodynamic Monitoring System Devices 59
3.1.15 Patent Foramen Ovale Devices 59
3.1.16 Atrial & Ventricular Septal Defect Device 61
3.1.17 Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device 62
3.1.18 Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Machine 63
3.2 FDA RECALLS 64
3.2.1 MAQUET 64
3.2.2 Medtronic 66
3.2.3 HeartWare Inc 67
3.3 CLINICAL TRIALS 68
3.3.1 Medtronic 68
3.3.2 St. Jude Medical 70
3.3.3 Abiomed 75
3.3.4 Heartware Inc 76
ON-PUMP CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS DEVICE MARKET 78
4.1 INTRODUCTION 78
4.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 80
4.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 83
4.3.1 On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Disposables Market 83
4.3.2 Perfusion System Market 85
4.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 87
4.4.1 Market Drivers 87
4.4.2 Market Limiters 88
4.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 90
ABBREVIATIONS 93
APPENDIX: COMPANY PRESS RELEASES 96

Chart 1 1: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market by Segment, U.S., 2014 – 2024 3
Chart 1 2: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market Overview, U.S., 2017 & 2024 3
Chart 4 1: On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2014 – 2024 81
Chart 4 2: On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Device Market Breakdown by Segment, U.S., 2017 82
Chart 4 3: On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Device Market Breakdown by Segment, U.S., 2024 82
Chart 4 4: On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Disposables Market, U.S., 2014 – 2024 84
Chart 4 5: Perfusion System Market, U.S., 2014 – 2024 86
Chart 4 6: Leading Competitors, On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Device Market, U.S., 2017 92

Figure 1 1: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2017 (1 of 4) 4
Figure 1 2: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2017 (2 of 4) 5
Figure 1 3: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2017 (3 of 4) 5
Figure 1 4: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2017 (4 of 4) 5
Figure 1 5: Companies Researched in this Report, U.S., 2017 6
Figure 1 6: Factors Impacting the Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 4) 7
Figure 1 7: Factors Impacting the Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 4) 8
Figure 1 8: Factors Impacting the Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market by Segment, U.S. (3 of 4) 9
Figure 1 9: Factors Impacting the Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market by Segment, U.S. (4 of 4) 10
Figure 1 10: Recent Events in the Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Market, U.S., 2015 – 2017 11
Figure 1 11: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Procedures Covered, U.S., 2017 (1 of 4) 12
Figure 1 12: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Procedures Covered, U.S., 2017 (2 of 4) 13
Figure 1 13: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Procedures Covered, U.S., 2017 (3 of 4) 14
Figure 1 14: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Procedures Covered, U.S., 2017 (4 of 4) 15
Figure 1 15: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2017 16
Figure 1 16: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Markets Covered, U.S., 2017 (1 of 2) 17
Figure 1 17: Cardiac Surgery and Heart Valve Devices Markets Covered, U.S., 2017 (2 of 2) 18
Figure 1 18: Key Report Updates (1 of 2) 19
Figure 1 19: Key Report Updates (2 of 2) 20
Figure 1 20: Version History 20
Figure 3 1: Tissue Heart Valves by Company 42
Figure 3 2: Mechanical Tissue Heart Valves by Company 44
Figure 3 3: Annuloplasty Repair Devices by Company 46
Figure 3 4: Transcatheter Heart Valve Replacement Devices by Company 48
Figure 3 5: Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Devices by Company 49
Figure 3 6: On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Devices by Company 51
Figure 3 7: Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Devices by Company 52
Figure 3 8: Endoscopic Vessel Harvesting Devices by Company 53
Figure 3 9: Anastomosis Assist Devices by Company 54
Figure 3 10: Transmyocardial Revascularization Devices by Company 55
Figure 3 11: Ventricular Assist Devices by Company 56
Figure 3 12: Intra-Aortic Balloon Devices by Company 57
Figure 3 13: Temporary Artificial Heart Replacement Devices by Company 58
Figure 3 14: Remote Hemodynamic Monitoring System Devices by Company 59
Figure 3 15: Patent Foramen Ovale Devices by Company 60
Figure 3 16: Atrial & Ventricular Septal Defect Devices by Company 61
Figure 3 17: Left Atrial Appendage Closure Devices by Company 62
Figure 3 18: Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Machine by Company 63
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall MAQUET 64
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall MAQUET 64
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall MAQUET 65
Figure 3 22: Class 1 Device Recall Medtronic 66
Figure 3 23: Class 1 Device Recall Heartware Inc 67
Figure 3 24: The Medtronic Harmony™ Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Clinical Study 68
Figure 3 25: Medtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant System (CoreValve System Family) Post Marketing Surveillance 68
Figure 3 26: Medtronic CoreValve Evolut R U.S. Clinical Study 69
Figure 3 27: Medtronic Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Low Risk Patients 69
Figure 3 28: AMPLATZER™ Post-infarct Muscular VSD Occluder Humanitarian Device Exemption 70
Figure 3 29: AMPLATZER Duct Occluder II Additional Sizes (ADO II AS) 70
Figure 3 30: HeartMate 3 CE Mark Study Long Term Follow-up (HM3 CE LTFU) 71
Figure 3 31: Trifecta™ GT Post Market Clinical Follow-up 71
Figure 3 32: AMPLATZER™ LAA Occluder Post Approval Study (PAS) 72
Figure 3 33: AMPLATZER™ Cardiac Plug Observational Post-Approval Study (ACP PAS China) 72
Figure 3 34: MOMENTUM 3 Continued Access Protocol (MOMENTUM 3 CAP) 73
Figure 3 35: AMPLATZER™ Amulet™ LAA Occluder Trial (Amulet IDE) 73
Figure 3 36: Prevention of Non-Surgical Bleeding by Management of HeartMate II 74
Figure 3 37: Door To Unloading With IMPELLA CP System in Acute Myocardial Infarction (DTU) 75
Figure 3 38: Protected PCI Study 75
Figure 3 39: Assessment of the WATCHMAN™ Device 76
Figure 3 40: Watchman FLX Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device Post Approval Study 76
Figure 3 41: Investigational Device Evaluation of the WATCHMAN FLX™ LAA Closure Technology 77
Figure 4 1: On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2014 – 2024 (US$M) 80
Figure 4 2: On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Disposables Market, U.S., 2014 – 2024 83
Figure 4 3: Perfusion System Market, U.S., 2014 – 2024 85
Figure 4 4: Drivers and Limiters, On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Device Market, U.S., 2017 89
Figure 4 5: Leading Competitors, On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Device Market, U.S., 2017 91
Figure 6 1: Press Release Summary 96

Edwards Lifesciences
St. Jude Medical
Medtronic
Maquet
Abiomed
HeartWare Inc.
Sorin Group
Terumo
Abbott Laboratories
Teleflex Medical
Cardiac Assist
AtriCure
W.L. Gore
SynCardia
Boston Scientific
Cryolife
Others include: Berlin Heart, Cardica, Chase Medical, Genesee Biomedical, Karl Storz, LifeNet Health, Microline Surgical, Novadaq, On-X, Saphena Medical, SentreHeart, Vitalitec, etc.

$2,995.00

Research Assistance

We can help you find
data and analyses
relevant to your needs,
or prepare a custom report.

Please contact us at [email protected]
or +1 212 564 2838

 

Custom Research

Contact us to speak
with your industry analyst.

[email protected] 
+1 212 564 2838

 



Discount Codes

Request Discount Codes
for reports of interest to you.

[email protected]
+1 212 564 2838