Japan Market Report for Surgical Robotics Systems 2017 - MedCore

iData Research
475 Pages - IDR10389
$2,995.00

General Report Contents
• Market Analyses include: Unit Sales, ASPs, Market Value & Growth Trends
• Market Drivers & Limiters for each chapter segment
• Competitive Analysis for each chapter segment
• Section on recent mergers & acquisitions
The domestic Japanese surgical robotics industry has been slow to develop, chiefly due to strict regulatory controls which have dissuaded companies from making investments in this area of research. The Japanese government announced a policy shift in 2014, in particular a restructuring of the approval process to make it more efficient. This has encouraged greater interest in developing domestic robotic options, including in surgery. It is expected that more Japanese companies will invest in this area throughout the forecast period.
The best example of surgeon-controlled robotics designed for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is the da Vinci® system from Intuitive Surgical. This system involves highly sophisticated robotic arms that assist in MIS procedures. The surgical arms and the instruments they are equipped with are smaller than surgeon’s hands, and are capable of performing very delicate MIS procedures. The surgeon must control the robotic arms through a workstation using real time video and other feedback from the robot. The da Vinci® system is moving toward becoming the standard of care for prostatectomy and has been used for dozens of other procedures. Currently, it is by far the most successful surgical robotic system in the Japanese and global markets. The New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), a public Japanese agency which operates as an Independent Administrative Institution, intends to develop a system to compete with the da Vinci®.

'

TABLE OF CONTENTS I
LIST OF FIGURES XXI
LIST OF CHARTS XXVI
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
JAPAN ROBOTICS AND SURGICAL NAVIGATION MARKET OVERVIEW 1
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 4
MARKET TRENDS 6
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 8
MARKETS INCLUDED 8
KEY REPORT UPDATES 9
VERSION HISTORY 9
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 10
1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE 10
1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY 10
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 10
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 12
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 13
Step 4: Performing Primary Research 14
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 16
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 17
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 19
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 20
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 21
DISEASE OVERVIEW 22
2.1 MEDICAL CONDITIONS 22
2.1.1 Neurosurgery Conditions 22
2.1.1.1 Hydrocephalus 22
2.1.1.2 Communicating Hydrocephalus 22
2.1.1.3 Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus 23
2.1.1.4 Non-Communicating Hydrocephalus 23
2.1.1.5 Brain Tumor 23
2.1.1.6 Intracranial Pressure 23
2.1.1.7 Intracranial Aneurysm 23
2.1.1.8 Intracranial Atherosclerosis Disease 23
2.1.2 Spinal Conditions 25
2.1.2.1 Herniated Disc 25
2.1.2.2 Spinal Stenosis 25
2.1.2.3 Spondylosis 25
2.1.2.4 Scoliosis 25
2.1.2.5 Lordosis 25
2.1.2.6 Kyphosis 26
2.1.3 ENT Conditions 27
2.1.3.1 Otitis Media 27
2.1.3.2 Cholesteatomas 27
2.1.3.3 Otosclerosis 27
2.1.3.4 Chronic Sinusitis 27
2.1.3.5 Tonsillitis 27
2.1.4 Orthopedic Conditions 28
2.1.4.1 Fractures 28
2.1.4.2 Osteoporosis 28
2.1.4.3 Arthritis 28
2.1.5 Gynecological Conditions 28
2.1.5.1 Gynecological Cancers 28
2.1.5.2 Uterine Fibroids 29
2.1.5.3 Endometriosis 29
2.1.5.4 Menorrhagia 29
2.1.5.5 Pelvic Prolapse 29
2.1.6 Urological Conditions 31
2.1.6.1 Prostate Cancer 31
2.1.6.2 Bladder Cancer 31
2.1.6.3 Kidney Cancer 31
2.1.6.4 Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) 32
2.1.7 Digestive Tract Conditions 33
2.1.7.1 Achalasia 33
2.1.7.2 Stomach Cancer 33
2.1.7.3 Hernia 33
2.1.7.4 Gallbladder Attack 33
2.1.7.5 Gastroesophageal Reflex Disease 34
2.1.8 Colorectal Conditions 35
2.1.8.1 Colorectal Cancer 35
2.1.8.2 Inflammatory Bowel Disease 35
2.1.8.3 Diverticulitis 35
2.1.9 Cardiac Conditions 37
2.1.9.1 Mitral Valve Prolapse 37
2.1.9.2 Coronary Artery Disease 37
PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 38
3.1 ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERY PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 38
3.1.1 Robotic-Assisted Surgery Overview 38
3.1.2 Neurosurgery 39
3.1.3 Spine Surgery 41
3.1.4 Orthopedic Surgery 42
3.2 RAS REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS 44
3.2.1 Accuray Inc. 44
3.2.2 Blue Belt Technologies 46
3.2.3 Hansen Medical Inc. 47
3.2.4 Intuitive Surgical 48
3.2.5 MAKO Surgical/Stryker 67
3.2.6 OMNIlife Science 69
3.3 CLINICAL TRIALS 71
3.4 RAS CLINICAL TRIALS 72
3.4.1 Accuray Inc. 72
3.4.2 Catheter Precision 78
3.4.3 Corindus Inc 80
3.4.4 Hansen Medical 82
3.4.5 Intuitive Surgical 83
3.4.6 MAKO Surgical/Stryker 86
3.4.7 Mazor 89
3.4.8 Medrobotics 92
3.4.9 Medtech 93
SURGICAL ROBOTICS MARKET 94
4.1 INTRODUCTION 94
4.2 MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY ROBOTIC DEVICE MARKET 96
4.2.1 Introduction 96
4.2.2 Market Analysis and Forecast 96
4.2.3 Drivers and Limiters 101
4.2.3.1 Market Drivers 101
4.2.3.2 Market Limiters 101
4.2.4 Leading Competitors 103
4.2.5 Emerging Competitors 104
4.3 ROBOTIC RADIOSURGERY DEVICE MARKET 105
4.3.1 Introduction 105
4.3.2 Market Analysis and Forecast 105
4.3.3 Drivers and Limiters 110
4.3.3.1 Market Drivers 110
4.3.3.2 Market Limiters 110
4.3.4 Leading Competitors 112
ABBREVIATIONS 113
APPENDIX: COMPETITOR PRESS RELEASES 115

Chart 1 1: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market by Segment, Japan, 2013 – 2023 2
Chart 1 2: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market Overview, Japan, 2016 & 2023 3
Chart 4 1: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Japan, 2013 – 2023 100
Chart 4 2: Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Japan, 2013 – 2023 109

Figure 1 1: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, Japan, 2016 (1 of 2) 4
Figure 1 2: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, Japan, 2016 (2 of 2) 5
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, Japan, 2016 5
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, Japan (1 of 2) 6
Figure 1 5: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, Japan (2 of 2) 7
Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market, Japan, 2013 – 2016 8
Figure 1 7: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Markets Covered, Japan, 2016 8
Figure 1 8: Key Report Updates 9
Figure 1 9: Version History 9
Figure 3 1: Robot-Assisted Neurosurgery Products by Company 40
Figure 3 2: Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery Products by Company 41
Figure 3 3: Robot-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Products by Company 43
Figure 3 4: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 44
Figure 3 5: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 44
Figure 3 6: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 44
Figure 3 7: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 45
Figure 3 8: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 45
Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 45
Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies 46
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies 46
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies 46
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical 47
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical 47
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical 47
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 48
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 48
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 48
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 49
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 49
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 49
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 50
Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 50
Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 51
Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 51
Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 52
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 53
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 53
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 53
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 54
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 54
Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 55
Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 55
Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 55
Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 56
Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 56
Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 56
Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 57
Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 57
Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 58
Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 59
Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 59
Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 60
Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 60
Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 61
Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 61
Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 61
Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 62
Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 62
Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 62
Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 63
Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 63
Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 63
Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 64
Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 64
Figure 3 56: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 64
Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 64
Figure 3 58: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 65
Figure 3 59: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 65
Figure 3 60: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 65
Figure 3 61: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 67
Figure 3 62: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 67
Figure 3 63: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 67
Figure 3 64: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 68
Figure 3 65: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 68
Figure 3 66: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 68
Figure 3 67: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 69
Figure 3 68: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 69
Figure 3 69: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 69
Figure 3 70: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 70
Figure 3 71: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 70
Figure 3 72: Endoscopic Evaluation of Late Rectal Injury Following CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Prostate Cancer 72
Figure 3 73: CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer 72
Figure 3 74: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Prostate Tumors 73
Figure 3 75: Study To Establish Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cyberknife in Patients 73
Figure 3 76: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Radiosurgery to Perioptic Tumors 74
Figure 3 77: Evaluation of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer 74
Figure 3 78: An Effectiveness and Toxicity of CyberKnife Based Radiosurgery for Parkinson Disease 75
Figure 3 79: CyberKnife Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (SAPBI) (CK-SAPBI) 75
Figure 3 80: Safety and Efficacy Study of Five-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy 76
Figure 3 81: A Study of Pre-Operative Cyberknife in Patients With Potentially Resectable Pancreas Cancer 76
Figure 3 82: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma 77
Figure 3 83: A Phase II Study of Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma 77
Figure 3 84: Safety and Feasibility of Arrhythmia Ablation Using the Amigo Remote Robotic System 78
Figure 3 85: Evaluation of the Amigo Robotic System for Ablation of the Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus 78
Figure 3 86: Manual vs Amigo SmartTouch Atrial Fibrillation Study (MAST-AF) 79
Figure 3 87: Robotic-Assisted Peripheral Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease (RAPID) 80
Figure 3 88: Robotic-Assisted Peripheral Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease II (RAPID II) 80
Figure 3 89: Post-Market CorPath Registry on the CorPath 200 System 81
Figure 3 90: Embolization Procedures in the Peripheral Vasculature Using the Magellan™ Robotic System 82
Figure 3 91: Registry of the Magellan Robotic System (ROVER) 82
Figure 3 92: Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair 83
Figure 3 93: A Retrospective Multicenter Investigation of the Use of the da Vinci® Surgical System 83
Figure 3 94: Cosmesis, Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After da Vinci 84
Figure 3 95: Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection 84
Figure 3 96: Prospective Investigation of Robotic Single-port System 85
Figure 3 97: Clinical Outcomes of Knee Replacement 86
Figure 3 98: A Trial Evaluating TKR Compared to BKR Performed Using Stryker's Mako Robot 86
Figure 3 99: Robotic Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty 87
Figure 3 100: Outcomes of Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty 87
Figure 3 101: Clinical and Economic Comparison of Robot Assisted Versus Manual Knee Replacement 88
Figure 3 102: Prospective, Observational Registry of Renaissance-guided Spine Surgeries 89
Figure 3 103: Clinical Trial of Minimally Invasive Robotic Spine Surgery 89
Figure 3 104: Robotic vs. Freehand Corrective Surgery for Pediatric Scoliosis (PEDSCOLI) 90
Figure 3 105: ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity 90
Figure 3 106: MIS ReFRESH: Robotic vs. Freehand Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries 91
Figure 3 107: A Post-Market Clinical Trial for Access and Visualization 92
Figure 3 108: Robotic-assisted Pedicule Screw Placement (ARASS) 93
Figure 4 1: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Japan, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 98
Figure 4 2: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Japan, 2013 – 2023 (JP¥) 99
Figure 4 3: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Japan, 2016 102
Figure 4 4: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Navigation System Market, Japan, 2016 103
Figure 4 5: Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Japan, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 107
Figure 4 6: Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Japan, 2013 – 2023 (JP¥) 108
Figure 4 7: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Japan, 2016 111
Figure 4 8: Leading Competitors, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Japan, 2016 112
Figure 6 1: Press Release Summary 115
Figure 6 2: Press Release Summary 395

Brainlab
Medtronic
Stryker
Karl Storz
*Not all companies are currently active in every segment or sub-report from this suite. For more details contact an iData Research Product Advisor.

$2,995.00

Research Assistance

We can help you find
data and analyses
relevant to your needs,
or prepare a custom report.

Please contact us at [email protected]
or +1 212 564 2838

 

Custom Research

Contact us to speak
with your industry analyst.

[email protected] 
+1 212 564 2838

 



Discount Codes

Request Discount Codes
for reports of interest to you.

[email protected]
+1 212 564 2838